Peer Review Process

All papers published in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Systems and New Applications (ICISNA) are subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process conducted during the conference submission stage.

Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent expert reviewers. The peer review process is conducted through the official conference submission system.

Review Procedure

  • Manuscripts are initially submitted through the official ICISNA conference submission system.

  • Each submission undergoes a double-blind peer review, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed.

  • Every paper is evaluated by at least two independent expert reviewers based on originality, technical quality, relevance to the conference themes, scientific contribution, and clarity.

  • The review process is managed by the Scientific and Program Committees of the conference.

Acceptance and Publication

  • Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the conference committees decide on acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.

  • Only papers that are accepted after successful peer review and presented at the conference are eligible for publication.

  • Final, revised versions of accepted papers are uploaded by the authors to the Proceedings publication platform and published in the ICISNA Proceedings Series.

Ethical Standards

  • All reviewers and editors are required to adhere to principles of confidentiality, objectivity, and conflict-of-interest disclosure.

  • The peer review process follows internationally recognized standards of academic publishing ethics.

All papers included in the Proceedings have successfully completed the peer review process described above.